In this case I feel the video brings a great deal of value to understanding the topic. The photo's are good supplementary material, but do not offer as much as the video. Video talk26 February UTC. They have not mentioned a single biological factoid that one can glean from the video and the images that one cannot get from the text.
They seem to think that this is a one-way street: those who want to delete should argue for deletion and the default is keep. That may work in AfD discussions, but not in these kinds of cases. Yes, Cyclopia, there might be something wrong, and your grammar, ejaculation would be nothing wrong," as if your stating some law of the universe, obfuscates that it is some people who think there would be nothing wrong with that kind of image.
Category:Videos of ejaculation - Wikimedia Commons
I'm really tired of this idea that removing some image would be censorship, that some sort of default is to include everything no matter the source. An image, video, or even text has to have encyclopedic value, it has to help the article in some scientific, objective, pedagogical way.
No one has yet argued any benefit for these images, and I am not surprised at that. But, Azure, I appreciate your calm and deliberate response. Drmies talk26 February UTC. In regard to the cumshot video masquerading as educational information on this page: Seems this was a big topic back in February; sorry Video late for the show. Now we have a minor upgrade, in that the video superficially appears to be more clinical.
Unfortunately, that is just not good enough. I would submit that one cannot design an encyclopedia article around such users. No, the video's inclusion on the page is video embarrassment to Wikipedia — that is, if Wikipedia is ever to be taken seriously as an encyclopedia. I suppose the editors who have made the point that this video significantly adds to the article would find me a shade more willing to accept their argument if any — ANY - of the ejaculation pages had an embedded video of a human performing the act:. Feces page noexcretion page nodefecation page noSaliva page noexpectoration page noUrination page no ; urine fetishism page noMucus page noAutomucophagy page noanal sex page noanal fisting page nobestiality page nocrush video page noHomicide page noterrorism page noal qaeda in iraq my sister sleeping naked pics nodecapitation page noNick Berg page no.
Video yourself this: cahena xxx it be seen in other famous encyclopedic publications? If not, think twice and ejaculation again before inclusion. Otherwise, you risk helping to drag this once noble experiment that is Wikipedia down into the laughingstock that it is now in real danger of becoming not just referring to this page.
It has always been an uphill battle for us to achieve respect for Wikipedia ejaculation the educated.
Category:Videos of male ejaculation - Wikimedia Commons
For awhile, I thought we were turning the tide, but this page makes me wonder. I think that the burden of proof that the video adds to the article rests squarely with those who think it does add.
To date, I have found the arguments for inclusion less than persuasive, to say the least. Rodney talk14 May Ejaculation. Normally I would suggest that a discussion of the ideals expressed as encyclopedic to not be within any particular page.
But these conversations specific to the graphic examples are very interesting to me. Sorry to sound filthiest anal sex in the world cumbaya on you all, but in many cases I really do believe ejaculation each side of this issue hold the motivations of the other side as suspect. There really is an impasse here that is simply not going to ever be resolved. I don't know how wikipedia is designed to get past such a thing. And no, "Discussion" veiled ire isn't going to do it.
Tgm talk23 July UTC. The four plate image I put in the article just before it was protected seemed to generate controversy. I feel that it is appropriate and adds useful information to the few images in the article. However, some people disagree. There has been consensus for the video in the past, but not video the four plate image. I have read all of the recent comments on this, and I feel it is best to pull video image until I am sure there is consensus. Wikpedia is not a democracy. However -- I am polling to see if we have consensus for inclusion or not.
Please feel free to express yourself as much as you like. It appears no further video is going to be added to this discussion. As an uninvolved editor I'll put a button on it so it can be archived for future reference and I don't doubt the issue will be breached again. Luna Santin are in favor of the image's inclusion in the article while mmd r18 editors oppose it. Although not the largest sampling of editor input, it appears the brunt of reasonable arguments for or against have been put forth by both sides with a clear majority of editors in favor of image inclusion I hesitate to call it a consensus with such limited input.
As the article already reflects this conclusion, there is no need to make any change to it. Dissent is based in the belief that the detail video text obviates the image's inclusion or ejaculation the image is simply unnecessary with a video clip already illustrating the exact same process. The former holds little water as any ejaculation written article should thoroughly detail its subject without illustration - the purpose of the added images is to enhance and present the material in a different way.
However, the latter argument certainly presents a potentially valid justification for exclusion. While a rebuttal exists in the fact that some users may lack the means to properly view the video, I haven't been able to dig up any video or precedent with regard to multiple formats visually illustrating the same thing. The use of embedded video throughout the project is ejaculation largely in its infancy and many such stylistic guidelines have yet to be established. As such, if this matter is revisited in the future, I would recommend requesting input from a wider ejaculation in an effort to do just that.
I think that the video should indicate that the man ejaculating has a below video penis. That is not a 6 penis. It might be within a range that is considered average but the penis depicted would generally be considered small. If we are showing an ejaculation video for "completeness" I think that it is only fair that the ejaculator's penis be appropriately described. That point should also be made as if someone actually needs an ejaculation video to "understand" what's going on then they probably don't understand how much hair should be around the genitalia either.
The above discussion point is a ridiculous proposition and is a bad joke in poor taste. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Actually I suspect a lot of page-blanking, deletion of content occurs precisely because policy is being abused to prevent a consensus for removal from forming and editors who initially started out by discussing removal get so fed-up at the abuse see no-other way. It's not right but perhaps it is at times understandable.
Please consult the many archives related to this discussion, wherein all the objections given here ejaculation dealt ejaculation. With regard to the rather novel objections raised by the OP in this section, it appears that User With regard to your worries about the subject's pubic hair, again he appears entirely normal.
As evidenced by the other parts of his body visible in the video, this chap seems to have a small, though completely normal, amount of fine, fair body hair entirely consistent with his pubic hair. I hope this allays your worries regarding the subject of the video. As for the need for the video, I direct your attention to the article squarewhich features no fewer than six detailed images, including video animation, of the familiar quadrilateral known to everybody over the age of 3. Cyclopia, I find the argument that the video is appropriate because it video about the topic not very compelling.
This page contains unnecessary graphic description of male ejaculation. This site is frequently used by kids that can see this graphic material. Please remove ejaculation video and photographs. Why is there only one frame on the final photo instead of the original four? While I divina a nude find references to prostate conditions, I can't find any description of semen production in this page.
I feel this page would benefit from either a short paragraph about semen production, or a link to the same. Four Frame Photo clearly identified earlier see archived discussion to be from an online pornographic video, and therefore unsuitable for an educational article likely to be of interest to a wide audience.
Isn't this article anthropocentric? Human beings are hardly the only species to experience ejaculation. Gatoclass talkejaculation December UTC. Instead of going into the legal intricacies of what is or what isn't allowed on wikipedia's webpage, how about we think generously and altruistically about the children of this world. Normally, to see ejaculations one has to sign in to a password-protected porn site.
Wikipedia's page is nothing of the sort, so let us remember back to a time when we were not all desensitized by the glut of online porn, when the innocence of our children was something to uphold and protect and when video knew that letting a child see a graphic sexual act was a breech of his innocence - in short, when ejaculation was something a boy saw first when his own body performed it.
Wikipedia could dance video and around on the censorship issue, and perhaps win on those grounds and continue to broadcast these images, but wikipedia has a social responsibility. Of course a common response will be, "Why is nude pics of mia rose harmful for a child to see a real ejaculation? This happens! It's biological! It's prom orgy these images titillate, they arouse at least in those that haven't been been over-exposed to porn and have the potentional to induce a child into the seamy world of online sexual addiction, that a child should be protected from them.
Media in category "Videos of male ejaculation"
That's why. Does anyone have a heart for this issue? Can anyone be sensate and feeling enough to want to spare children from the under-world of online sexual perversion? Does anyone still appreciate the difference between sexual health and sexual perversion? We could trumpet our "right" to express, educate, disseminate video sexy dragon ball girls without hindrance, but could we shift the debate to the responsibility we have to our children.
And don't say it's the children's fault for finding the page. Nathanpgw talk27 December UTC. There was no clear consensus found either way on the four plate - either to ejaculation or delete. That was the result of the last RFC. Please stop closing discussions on the matter. Currently there is just you Cyclopia and Atom arguing for keeping or rather just Atom, as you only close the discussions. So I think given that we do exercise editorial discretion and don't just keep video inserted in an article the image should be deleted.
I have no agenda here I am neither a deletionist nor an inclusionist - I simply want to maintain an encyclopedic quality to the article. Context does not change the material - putting porn in an encyclopedia ejaculation lowers the tone and quality of the article.
It did not end up on X-tube by some accident, video was made there, recorded from a live stream - so it was made for voyeurism ejaculation exhibitionism, whichever way you want to look at it. The simple fact is the video two images both sexual fit well with this article and there have been no objections to them, whereas the video and fourplate have been a constant source of dispute - even from users who had no awareness of the source - so context does not make something educational.
And the fourplate provides no additional information. It should go. Consensus is defined by Merriam-Webster as, firstly - general agreement and, secondly - group solidarity of belief or sentiment. Consensus decision-making. While Wikipedia's written policies and guidelines should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policy without consideration for the principles of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, ignore them. Disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures.
People you all need to realize this is wikipedia 1. Even Wikipedia has its limitiations, and ejaculation are within those limitations 2. Being a discussion you are free to post, but realize that the law remains firm 3. Someone would not be on this page if they didn't know what it meant 4. It is a body process that is not showing anything inappropriate or disgusting or wrong. So please keep morality and responsiblity aside —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firstly there is no consensus here just busty carly status quo.
Or what did the editor closing the last RFC mean when he said "I'd hestitate to say there was a consensus". I am still learning about how ejaculation works, I did not sit down and read every policy and guideline before I started, I suspect I am not the only one who launched in and was bold. I have tended to check policy when conflicts have arisen. I am doing that moreso now.
Free porn games com just found this. It is often better to video a less-than-perfect compromise video with the understanding that the article is gradually improving - than to german sex cartoon to fight to implement a particular 'perfect' version immediately.
Also anyone can still delete the image and give a reason even if there was a consensus. Then we see what happens ie. Thats how this works. You'll ejaculation I have not deleted it, my main reasons for continuing here are to counter some of the impressions being given that there is some consensus for keeping.
Finding compromise is part of the consensus process when there is disagreement. This has not happened.
Ejaculation - Wikipedia
It was not actually said that the article needed no illustrations, the objection was that the article was satisfactorily illustrated video by the two ejaculation and that the four plate being from a porn video lowers the tone of the article and actually added nothing. I'd agree to a compromise on the video to collapse it, or if that is too much for some, deletion of the four-plate only.
The main substance is ejaculation the diagrams. People, please let's stop arguing with DMSBel. He video wants the attention. Let's leave him alone. Note : DMSBel has posted an issue about the images here. Honestly, I have no idea if the image is from a porn site. Ejaculation Penis Ultra Ejaculation scatter pattern. Ejaculation-masturbation slow motion. French male ejaculation Handsfree Male ejaculation with a toy. Male ejaculation. Male Masturbation forward view. The force and amount of semen that will be ejected during an ejaculation will vary widely between men and may contain between 0.
Adult semen volume is affected by the time that has passed since the previous ejaculation; larger semen volumes ejaculation seen with greater durations of abstinence. The duration video the stimulation leading up to the ejaculation can affect the volume. One of the possible underlying causes of low volume or complete lack of semen is ejaculatory duct obstruction. It is normal for the amount of semen to diminish with age. The number of sperm in an ejaculation also varies widely, depending on many factors, including the time since the last ejaculation,  age, stress levels,  shemale in spandex testosterone.
Greater lengths of sexual stimulation immediately preceding ejaculation can result in higher concentrations of sperm. Video first ejaculation in males often occurs about 12 months after the onset of pubertygenerally through masturbation or nocturnal emission wet dreams. This first semen volume is small.
The typical ejaculation over the following three months produces less than 1 ml of semen.
The semen produced during early puberty is also typically clear. After ejaculation this early semen remains jellylike and, unlike semen from mature males, fails video liquefy. A summary of semen development is shown in Table 1. Most first ejaculations 90 percent lack sperm. As ejaculation male proceeds through puberty, the semen develops mature characteristics with increasing quantities of normal sperm. Semen produced 12 to 14 months after the first ejaculation liquefies after a short period of time.
Within 24 months of the first ejaculation, the semen volume and the quantity and characteristics of the sperm match that of adult male semen. Some remain jellylike. There is a central pattern generator in the spinal cordmade up of groups of spinal interneuronsthat is involved in the rhythmic response of ejaculation.
This is known as the spinal generator for ejaculation. To map the neuronal activation of the brain during the ejaculatory response, researchers have studied the expression of c-Fosa proto-oncogene expressed in neurons in response to stimulation by hormones and neurotransmitters. Although uncommon, some men can achieve ejaculations during masturbation without any manual stimulation. Such men usually do it by ejaculation and flexing their abdominal and buttocks muscles along with vigorous nude pic with funny quotes. Others may do it by relaxing the area around the penis, which may result in harder erections especially when hyperaroused.
The duration of the stimulation leading up to the ejaculation can affect the volume. One of the possible underlying causes of low volume or complete lack of semen is ejaculatory duct obstruction. It is normal for the amount of semen to diminish with age. Video number of sperm in an ejaculation also varies video, depending on many ejaculation, including the time since the last ejaculation,  age, stress levels,  and testosterone. Greater lengths of sexual ejaculation immediately video ejaculation can result in higher concentrations of sperm.
The first ejaculation in males often occurs about 12 months after the onset of pubertygenerally through masturbation or nocturnal emission wet dreams. This first semen volume is small. The typical ejaculation over the ejaculation three months produces less than 1 ml of semen. The semen produced during early puberty is also typically clear. After ejaculation sluty young teens in public early semen remains jellylike and, unlike semen from mature males, fails to liquefy.
A summary of semen development is shown in Table 1. Most first ejaculations 90 percent video sperm. As the male proceeds through puberty, the semen develops mature characteristics with increasing quantities of normal sperm. Semen produced 12 to 14 months after ejaculation first ejaculation liquefies after a short period of time. Within 24 months of the first ejaculation, the semen volume video the quantity and characteristics of the sperm match that of adult male semen.
Some remain jellylike. There is a central pattern generator in the spinal cordmade up video groups of spinal interneuronsthat is involved in the rhythmic response of ejaculation. This is known as the spinal generator for ejaculation.
To map the neuronal activation of the brain during the ejaculatory response, researchers have studied the expression of c-Fosa proto-oncogene expressed in neurons in response to stimulation by hormones and neurotransmitters. Although uncommon, some men can achieve ejaculations during ejaculation without any manual stimulation. Such men usually do it by tensing and flexing their abdominal and buttocks muscles along with vigorous fantasising.
Others may do it by relaxing the area around the penis, which may result in harder erections especially when hyperaroused. Perineum pressing results in an ejaculation which is purposefully held back by pressing on either the perineum or the urethra to force the seminal fluid to remain inside. In such a scenario, the seminal fluid stays inside the body and goes to the bladder. Sexual intercourse with internal ejaculation. Standing sexual intercourse. Submerged ejaculation. Te snel klaarkomen - Emma's Peepshow. Tenga Egg. Two successive ejaculations.
Uncircumcised man ejaculating front view. Uncircumsized male masturbating. The kappa statistic for interobserver agreement was 0. In the reliable information group, the reliability 2.